Comments on: What content glut? https://downhere.dentrassi.net/2009/09/what-content-glut/ An Ex-Gnome Tank's World Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:18:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1 By: Intravax https://downhere.dentrassi.net/2009/09/what-content-glut/comment-page-1/#comment-7981 Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:28:30 +0000 http://downhere.dentrassi.net/?p=444#comment-7981 I agree. It’s more likely that because the content was so much harder, people didn’t get to see as much…unlike the way it is now.

]]> By: Namthe https://downhere.dentrassi.net/2009/09/what-content-glut/comment-page-1/#comment-7968 Sat, 03 Oct 2009 08:18:05 +0000 http://downhere.dentrassi.net/?p=444#comment-7968 Evidently I fail at mental arithmetic!

I’ve changed the post above – there is indeed one more boss in TBC than WotLK (not counting VoA). I don’t think that really detracts from my point though. People complain there was much more in the way of raid content in TBC when that isn’t really true.

]]> By: Intravax https://downhere.dentrassi.net/2009/09/what-content-glut/comment-page-1/#comment-7965 Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:27:00 +0000 http://downhere.dentrassi.net/?p=444#comment-7965 Just curious, I’ve added up your numbers multiple times and I’m just not seeing the totals intact. If you add VoA to the WotLK it would come out at 53 bosses. Unfortunately, my math makes the TBC boss total come out to 50 when you combine 10 and 25 man raids. So if you don’t count VoA then BC had 1 more raid level boss than WotLK.

]]>