<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Block Rating</title>
	<atom:link href="https://downhere.dentrassi.net/2008/06/on-block-rating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://downhere.dentrassi.net/2008/06/on-block-rating/</link>
	<description>An Ex-Gnome Tank&#039;s World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:18:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nam</title>
		<link>https://downhere.dentrassi.net/2008/06/on-block-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downhere.dentrassi.net/?p=40#comment-82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, you&#039;re right in what you&#039;ve said so far. 

In terms of bosses, the only time it&#039;s useful is in a passive uncrushable set. And the only really useful passive uncrushable sets involve mostly Black Temple and Sunwell gear.

However... if you&#039;re tanking lots of mobs on a trash pull (and especially if you have a shield spike or similar) then block rating will reduce incoming damage considerably. That&#039;s about its only use.

As to 90% avoidance, yes. Due to the way the combat table works (it&#039;s a single roll system, EJ can tell you more if you care), the 10% of hits that land will crush.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you&#8217;re right in what you&#8217;ve said so far. </p>
<p>In terms of bosses, the only time it&#8217;s useful is in a passive uncrushable set. And the only really useful passive uncrushable sets involve mostly Black Temple and Sunwell gear.</p>
<p>However&#8230; if you&#8217;re tanking lots of mobs on a trash pull (and especially if you have a shield spike or similar) then block rating will reduce incoming damage considerably. That&#8217;s about its only use.</p>
<p>As to 90% avoidance, yes. Due to the way the combat table works (it&#8217;s a single roll system, EJ can tell you more if you care), the 10% of hits that land will crush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sundermonkey</title>
		<link>https://downhere.dentrassi.net/2008/06/on-block-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sundermonkey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downhere.dentrassi.net/?p=40#comment-81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[feel free to correct me if im wrong here but i always thought the only real value in block rating is for a passive unchrushable set.

to put it this way, if you have 102.4% avoidance without block rating, you get no rage. you take no damage. you take it in the pooper.

where as if you have 102.4% with a solid chunk of block rating you will block all the attacks that hit and you wont get any chrushes.


on a side note if you only had 90% avoidance then all that landed would be crushes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>feel free to correct me if im wrong here but i always thought the only real value in block rating is for a passive unchrushable set.</p>
<p>to put it this way, if you have 102.4% avoidance without block rating, you get no rage. you take no damage. you take it in the pooper.</p>
<p>where as if you have 102.4% with a solid chunk of block rating you will block all the attacks that hit and you wont get any chrushes.</p>
<p>on a side note if you only had 90% avoidance then all that landed would be crushes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dezdemone</title>
		<link>https://downhere.dentrassi.net/2008/06/on-block-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dezdemone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downhere.dentrassi.net/?p=40#comment-67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YAY! I am not the only one who thinks block rating sucks!! I hear from soo many people who confuse block rating with block value... =)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YAY! I am not the only one who thinks block rating sucks!! I hear from soo many people who confuse block rating with block value&#8230; =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tankette</title>
		<link>https://downhere.dentrassi.net/2008/06/on-block-rating/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tankette]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://downhere.dentrassi.net/?p=40#comment-66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was a good explanation. I haven&#039;t spent much time looking at my dodge/parry/block but I know I am far from passive uncrushable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a good explanation. I haven&#8217;t spent much time looking at my dodge/parry/block but I know I am far from passive uncrushable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
